New Audience, New Problems

When Mrs. Forgette told our class that we were going to be making a website about our research paper I knew that there was a catch. Unfortunately for me, I was right. The research paper was ten pages of sophisticated writing directed toward an academic audience but our website was supposed to be aimed at 18 year olds. You wouldn’t think that this would be that big of a problem, but boy would you be wrong. By simply changing the audience I had to rethink my entire paper. I could not simply transfer references, rhetoric, or language from my research paper over to the website. Well, I could but I’m pretty sure that I would have failed the assignment. The real problem with this change wasn’t the age difference, it was the fine print of the audience which I don’t think a lot of the other students noticed. Our research paper was supposed to be an academic audience who was somewhat familiar with the topic at hand. The college students didn’t have a clue about our subjects. This meant that I had to explain more basics in my website than I did in my research paper. I went in with the mindset of teaching chemistry to a toddler; explain the basics in the simplest way you can, and include pictures.

As I started thinking of my new audience, I wondered how I was going to discuss failing schools in a way that not only intrigued them, but made them want to read more. My first draft was AWFUL. I wrote it and it made me bored to read it. I realized that I needed a complete overhaul. I rewrote my articles a couple more times and saw a drastic improvement. I had included anecdotes and several pop cultural references. I do hope that I never have to mention the Kardashians in a college paper again. I felt confident, but when I looked at the site as a whole it was still very bland. It was just text, good text, but nothing else. The first article that I started on was the racial inclusion piece. This text was not great compared to the others and I was having a lot of trouble finding anything to make this particular subject POP to a college audience. While I was watching TV one night, TNT played a commercial for “The Help” and a million ideas came to head. After finding what I believe to be the most perfect gifs for that text, I felt on top of the world. I finished the racial inclusion article around 9 at night and continued working until my entire homepage was done. I used that one idea throughout the whole homepage and was shocked at how great it came together. Now, I might have gotten a little gif heavy, but I doubt that I will ever do something so academically-creative again so I decided to go all out.

I really thought that I would despise this multimodal, maybe because of Powtoon’s looming presence, but I thoroughly enjoyed it.

Weekly Artifact

My artifact for this week is Buzzfeed. Buzzfeed is a website famous for its wacky quizzes and funny posts that are usually found being shared on social media sites. On Thursday I was taking a break from studying and was looking at Facebook on my computer. I came across a Buzzfeed article as I usually do, and decided to check it out. About half way through the article, I lightbulb popped up above my head. I realized that this format would be perfect for my website design. Buzzfeed does a great job at creating visual elements intertwined with their text. They like to use gifs, pictures, videos, quizzes, etc to make their audience interested in whatever subject they’re discussing. I immediately closed the Buzzfeed window and went to my website. I rewrote every post so that they would flow with pictures and gifs that I had found on the internet. I still feel uneasy about my site. I think that I may be pushing it on the college audience content, but I think that what I did might pay off big time. I did include a lot of gifs and funny references, but I still think that my message is still there.

Weekly Artifact

This week’s artifact is definitely the cause and effect research paper. I have worked on this paper so much this week! I can honestly say that I have never worked harder on any paper than I have on this one. This paper has showed me a new sense of dedication that was required to finished this paper. First off, I had put off starting my paper until last weekend because I assumed that 2000 wouldn’t take me too longer to write. Then, after I had two body paragraphs written, I accidentally deleted my paper and all of my work. So, after a brief moment of aggravation and several minutes yelling into a pillow, I began working again. I set a goal on Sunday that each day of this week I would write a minimum of 400 words a day. I can say that I bested that goal everyday by a pretty good bit. I had 7 pretty good sources from the annotated bibliographies and could have probably gotten by with just using those, but I pushed through the awfulness of citations and added about of dozen more sources. This paper literally made me scream. I wanted to quit this paper more than I have ever wanted to quit before. I have learned a lot about education in Mississippi as well as the writing process. I also learned a few more reasons not to procrastinate including that once you finally get started, you might have to start all over again due to an act of God, so start early in case that happens.

Annotated Bibliographies Unit Reflection

The research that I have done this semester has really changed the way that I think of things. I had really strong views on almost every myth at the beginning of the research period. By the time I had finished, I had a completely new way of thinking about everything. When I looked at political correctness, I knew that it could be bad but the thought of it leading to terrorist attacks and other criminal acts had never crossed my mind. With the annotated bibliographies, I was able to see education in Mississippi in an entirely different way, and I have lived here my whole life. I think that these research projects have taught me that nothing is exactly as it seems, you need to do a little researching. I am really glad that we did these annotated bibliographies instead of going straight into the research paper, because the first myth that I chose was awful. I looked at three myths before I settled on the one about social class and education. My first choice, “George Orwell meet Mark Zuckerberg”, looked interesting at first glance but once I began to research the topic I found that it was probably the biggest bore in the book. I would have say that the most surprising thing to come from research is how specific sources can get. When I started looking at social class and education, I read a lot of broad articles that pretty much summed up what Anyon talked about in the textbook. There were thousands of articles on the Ole Miss library database that popped up when I searched this topic, but none of them were different enough to advance me further into the researching process. I think I had made it to the six or seventh page of the library search results when I saw an article about education statistics in America with data from each state. I saw that Mississippi ranked lowest in almost everything which got me thinking. So, I searched “Mississippi Education Social Class”. This was the moment that my paper began to take shape. Each article that I found was so specific: “Mississippi Delta Education Hindered by Social Class”. I had hit the jackpot! I think that the researching process forces you to simplify your searches in order to get you to the sweet spot. One of the biggest lessons that I am going to take away from this project is not to give up. After throwing out my first three myths I felt like my obituary was going to say “Death by Annotated Bibliographies”. Once I had picked a myth, I was faced with the challenge of actually doing the research, writing the bibliographies, and putting everything neatly on a word document before Friday – this was Sunday. On Sunday and Monday I wrote all eight of my bibliographies and thought that every writing particle in my mind had been sucked dry. I never wanted to look at an annotated bibliography again. But, I knew that I had to look at them again and not give up if I wanted to get a good grade. I was so committed to these little monstrosities that I even went to conference with Mrs. Forgette to make sure that I was doing them right. I know that the annotated bibliographies were extremely helpful and that I learned valuable lessons, but I am beyond happy that they are over.

Weekly Artifact

The biggest thing that I am going to take away from this week is something that had nothing to do with my classes. For the past two weeks I have been working non-stop. I have spent my hours in the library than in my own room and yet I still seemed to be getting behind in my classes. On Thursdays, I don’t have class until 4 in the afternoon and I get out on Wednesday at 12, so I decided that I was going to take a break from studying to have time to myself. I don’t think that I have done this since the first week back this semester. I know that I can’t do this every week, but I think that I needed time to let my mind rest. When I finally woke up Thursday, I felt like a new person. I think that I was more productive after the day off than I was before.

The Perfect School

One group had the idea of being paired with a group of no more than 10 people with different backgrounds which really intrigued me. I want to couple that with another idea of having certain times for individual, group, and instructor led learning. I think that being able to work by yourself is just as important as working with other people, especially in our changing times. I might even go as far as to say that the 10 people in each group should rotate so that students don’t get used to who they are working to and let their work slip. I also like the idea of “Challenge courses” for students who feel as if they are not being taught at a high enough level. I think that by doing this, you would separate the successful students from those that are struggling. Then, teachers wouldn’t have to slow down or confuse students. Students would also be more comfortable in a setting of other students with around the same academic capacity. I’m leaning back and forth on whether I like the idea of having course level based off of previous assessment instead of grade level or age; I can’t imagine a 12 year old in the same class as an 18 year old.

I think that Writing 102 could definitely include the individual/group/instructor learning style. By doing this, we could learn how to get things done by ourselves while also feeling comfortable with debating things amongst a small group. I think that maybe there could be an optional “challenge project” that would push us toward our maximum critical thinking levels.

The Transformation from Freshman to Student

A little over three months ago, I, along with thousands of other freshmen, embarked on a scary, yet exciting new chapter in our lives. Most of us, myself included, thought that we were well prepared for our first classes as college students. If I were asked what I had learned during college, I would have a hard time stating anything other than useless facts related to my classes. My commonplace book includes posts from throughout the semester that express my progression as both a student and a person.
While I was rereading entries from my commonplace book, I was reminded of the dejected feeling that I had at the beginning of each unit. It was almost amusing to me to see how fearful I was of each project and then see how I gradually progressed through the writing process until I had slain the “beast”. The majority of my posts in the commonplace book talk about how everything was new to me, which was probably the cause of my anxiety in this class. Never did a moment go by where I felt comfortable or confident with what I was doing. Many posts portrayed this discomfort, such as the in class essay reflection where my first sentence states that I almost had a panic attack when I saw the unit instructions and the post on new ideas where I discussed how everything felt new to me. As the semester progressed so did my writing. I can see a great improvement from my first unit reflection to the second and so on. Just two weeks after the first reflection, I was thinking like a writer. I talked about how dreadful the drafting process was and how I was struggling with using rhetoric correctly in my paper which was astonishing to me because two weeks before then I had absolutely no idea what rhetoric was.
The more that I read my entries, I began to notice that many of my posts weren’t very deep in meaning. I knew from the beginning of the semester that I was supposed to write in a sophisticated manner, but I think that I flew through the short daily writes so I could get out of class early. With a simple glance over, I noticed that there was virtually no substance, which wouldn’t be good when it came time for grading. I think that the biggest think missing from my commonplace book would be the time put into it. It didn’t matter whether it was a short daily write or a lengthy reflection, I wrote the first things that came to my mind and rarely ever read over what I had written. Now that I have had to reread and correct the majority of my posts, I can definitely say that I have learned from my mistakes. I actually think that my comments are better than the original posts.
Nearly all of my entries had to do with learning. It’s not hard to imagine that as the semester progressed that I would continuously be learning as well, I mean that is the point of college. Through a simple exercise of watching differently composed Op-Docs, I realized that being different isn’t just okay, it is encouraged and praised. Without even knowing it, this semester has been one big “how to” guide on how to find your unique inner-writer. My reflections on The New York Times guide, the Op-Doc analysis, and the PowToon video express vivid amounts of frustration due to the fact that they were pushing me toward a creative edge that I had never dared exploring before. My high school never tried to get us toward the edge, but merely to memorize the basic five paragraph structure inside and out like we were cadets in the military. My commonplace book reminded me that finding this “creative edge” was a little like climbing Mount Everest. As each unit ended and a new began, I could feel myself becoming more and more comfortable with what I was doing. In my PowToon reflection, I talked about how I felt like a fish out of water at the beginning of the unit, but later described myself as one who was called to be an animator at Disney. The entry “mistakes” is one of my favorites because I can think of hundreds of mistakes I have made since August and the entry is only about four sentences long. Though it may be brief, it holds a pretty powerful message when it states that mistakes are okay because how else would we learn about ourselves. This logic can be applied to everything that we do, not just during college but in our lives as well.
The tags that I have decided to include are what I believe best represent my commonplace book. The first tag is “learning”. It may seem obvious but I learned so much about not the only the writing process, but in my self too. Nearly all of my entries in the commonplace book discuss some lesson that I learned from the time when I figured out MLA format to when I finally realized how to revise the style of my papers. The second tag is “Fear of Failure”. One of my favorite quotes is from Gena Showalter that says “Giving up is the only sure way to fail”. One of my biggest problems throughout the semester was being discouraged right from the beginning, which I talked about in each unit reflection. Once I overcame the fear of screwing up the project, I was finally able to get to work and spit out some pretty good material. My third tag is “Resiliency”. I thought about combining resiliency and fear of failure but the more that I thought about it, I realized that they were completely different. Resiliency deals with the extreme amount of effort that I put into each any ever piece that I brought to class even though I would rather be doing literally anything else. It also covers all of the times when I had no clue what I was doing and had to start over from scratch, even though I could have easily turned in a piece that would have received an okay grade. “Differences” is my fourth tag. The idea of differences first came to me when we were working on the Op-Doc analysis and each had videos that were all polar opposites of each other. Not only were the styles of our Op-Docs different, but so were the styles in which we wrote our analyses. In high school we learn how to do everything just like one another, but in college we finally open our eyes and see that being different is what makes us who we are. My final tag is “Creative Edge”. It took me to the late half of the semester to finally find my creative edge. Because it took me so long to find it, I had started to think that it was some mythical creature like Bigfoot. The creative edge is what makes a writer a writer. Hours of sitting at my desk, starring at my laptop, and jamming out to Spotify allowed me to dive into the deep dark parts of my mind of which I didn’t even know existed. While I was doing this, I would spit out material far superior to anything else that I had scribbled down. Before this semester I never thought about how simple things like the wording of a sentence or placement of a source can change the entire rhetorical outlook of your product. The creative edge, in my opinion, is the most important thing that you can find as a writer. When you combine all five of these tags together, you can begin to imagine the metamorphosis that I have undergone in just one short semester.

PowToon Unit Reflection

Screen Shot 2015-11-16 at 10.11.27 AM

 

 

The differences in composing the multimodal project versus the actual paper were astronomical. At first I thought that it would be easy to make the video, especially since I had already written an argument paper on the exact same subject. I immediately regretted that thought. I have felt out of place many times this semester, but during this particular unit I felt like a fish out of water, especially while recording the sound track. I am not the kind of person that enjoys talking, so imagine my reaction when Mrs. Forgette told us that we had to record at least three straight minutes of our voices. I absolutely hated recording the audio track. The Sunday before the first audio draft was due, I sat in my room for over an hour talking to myself like a complete idiot. The worst part wasn’t the actual recording, but the part after where you had to listen to it over and over until you wanted to throw your laptop against the wall in disgust. The images were a breeze for me compared to the audio. In less than two hours, I had composed nearly all of the visual elements and had fun brainstorming ideas of what could come next. After that, I felt as if my calling were to work for Disney. My favorite part of the visual track is from the screenshot above. I love how it incorporates the biggest statistics of my paper, while truly connecting with the audience. The little guy on the far left is portraying the college students getting assaulted on campus, but he is actually supposed to be typing.

To say that I am inexperienced with visual presentations would be an understatement. Before this semester, I never made a PowerPoint, or a Prezi, or anything to the nature of PowToon. When I started the project, I knew that I had to jump right into the deep end and find the ins and outs of PowToon. The hardest part of the design process was the audio track. I didn’t want my the audio to be stop and go; I wanted it to flow! I decided to record the audio all at once, which led an excessive amount of time to be spent on timing the slides. My favorite design choice was actually something that I hated at the beginning – the template. Of course, I wanted one of the premium templates because they were so appealing to the eye, but I started off choosing the black and white template from above. I didn’t think that I would continue to use this template throughout the paper, but merely used it as a starting point. Over the course of the design process, I started to like how it looked and how it represented the paper. There weren’t any colors, other than the red that I used on certain fonts, which allowed me to portray the “black & white” seriousness of underage drinking. This is a very serious subject and I don’t think that bright happy colors would have been a great fit.

I wrote three drafts of my script that were honestly the worst things that I have ever written in my entire life. I thought that since it was the same subject that I could just cut and paste sentences from my original paper. If my own draft made me want to fall asleep, there’s no telling what it would have done to my audience. If I had to choose between composing an actual paper with 1,500 words or a PowToon video of about 3 minutes, I would choose the paper. I like to list facts and elements that make an academic paper. I like to go by the basic rules of a paper that we all learned in elementary school because of its familiarity. Pontoon may be fun, but it’s new. I guess that I didn’t enjoy it because I felt so behind throughout the entire assignment. I will never again speak badly of writing a paper, because I have seen what some of the alternates are. When you look at which of the modes were most effective at addressing the issue, I think that PowToon wins. Emotion is a very powerful tool that many filmmakers utilize to portray their messages. When you see a video, even of a crappy little cartoon like mine, of a deaths and injuries caused by alcohol, you start to imagine the situations in real life. Being able to see a visual representation allowed a connection from the message to the audience that isn’t really viable with an academic essay. I liked the professional, academic audience. I didn’t enjoy having to make my video fun and appealing to younger people, especially with a topic like mine. With the professional audience, the more facts and sources that you incorporate, the more effective your paper is whereas the easily bored audience needs less credibility and more “Wow Factor”.

Being Different Isn’t Always Bad

The biggest thing that I learned from watching the three op doc videos was that all of our animated projects will be different and that’s okay. We saw a faced paced and slow paced videos that were animated in completely different ways. Each of these videos were organized and put together in a way that best fit that particular story. I think that’s what I am going to have to work on. If I can read over my script a few times and get an understanding of how I think my animation should be put together, I think that everything will come together.

Recovering with Creativity

Today in class we had to listen to several other multimodal projects. I can honestly say that after listening to about fifteen seconds of other pieces, I could tell how awful mine truly was. Once again I was witness to the writing rule that your first draft is pretty much absolute crap and so are the next five or six tries. I also learned that I wrote my script filled with evidence, which would be great if my audience were forty five year old high school teachers that desperately want to see evidence. Sadly, that’s not my audience. I learned that I have to make this script more interesting, and can possibly do so by taking away some facts and evidence and putting them into the project visually instead of audibly. I can guarantee that two days from now my script will be nothing like it is now.