When writing my draft, I decided to only add in a few details for right now about my topic. I did not want to overpower the essay with fact after fact, so instead I wrote about the necessities and what related to the essay at that moment, and then went from there.
I decided this was best because when I conduct my interview, I did not want it to sound like my essay was to repetitive if they said the same things I researched. I thought I added in some good information, but not too much to where the reader or recipient no longer feels interested in the topic or interview.
The steps were basically just looking up more information about Pinelake and how it came to be. I wanted to find out more about the roots of this church and then later dive more into Pinelake College.
I am obviously biased to Pinelake and Pinelake College because I attend both of them, however, I tried to avoid talking to much about my own experiences there and rather focused on what they do as a whole. I did not want to come across pushy or biased on PL College.
I didn’t really form an argument in my essay I would say rather than a build up to PL College. I gave multiple examples of what it is they do and why so many college aged people attend every Wednesday night.
I still need to do a bit more research on the history of Pinelake and who actually thought of Pinelake College and I still need to get my interview in regarding PL College.
