Blog Post 1/29/21

Reading Journal

 

Copy + Paste this template into a different document (do not try to type directly on it). Then fill it out and post to your blog. 

 

Title of Article + Proper MLA Citation for Works Cited page Dirk, Kerry. “Navigating Genres.” Https://Wac.colostate.edu, 2010, wac.colostate.edu/books/writingspaces1/dirk–navigating-genres.pdf. 

 

Summarize the article — include your reaction, thoughts, anything to help you remember its claims. 100 to 150 words This article talks about how to unders different genres. Then to use this understanding to your advantage in different situations. This advantage can help a person accomplish goals. By knowing the type of people or genre that you need to impress, you can tailor your work to be to their liking. Knowing this will help you stand out from your competition. Knowing genres helps understanding what an author was thinking when he was writing a work. It also talks about how there are so many different genres that shape our lives every single day. If you do not know what the genre is, ask questions.
Define new terms and concepts by quoting or paraphrasing the original author. Genre – a form or style of a work that are grouped together with similar works.
How does this reading connect to other articles from class and/or your own research?

 

Mother tongue 
Based on the reading, craft one question to act as a springboard for class discussion. Can every work be put into a genre?

 

Blog Post 1/27/21

Reading Journal

 

Copy + Paste this template into a different document (do not try to type directly on it). Then fill it out and post to your blog. 

 

Title of Article + Proper MLA Citation for Works Cited page DasBender, Gita. “Critical Thinking in College Writing: From the Personal to the Academic.” Https://Wac.colostate.edu, 2011, wac.colostate.edu/books/writingspaces2/dasbender–critical-thinking.pdf. 
Summarize the article — include your reaction, thoughts, anything to help you remember its claims. 100 to 150 words A critical thinker is someone who is a good reader, along with keeping an open mind and thinking about new ideas. Critical thinkers also think about what he/she is reading, not just look at the text. Along with thinking about what you are reading, you must understand key terms and be able to use quotations correctly. Then comes Academic writing which as stated in the article comes from “personal writing”. After that comes writing an essay, after you have taken good notes, and understand the text you are ready. During your essay you want to model yourself after a good writer to receive an A grade.
Define new terms and concepts by quoting or paraphrasing the original author. Critical Thinker – Someone who formulates new ideas about a text that he is reading.

 Stalk your Calling – Pursue what you want to do in life and let nothing stop you from being where you want to be.

How does this reading connect to other articles from class and/or your own research?

 

Brandt, Deborah. Sponsors of Literacy.
Based on the reading, craft one question to act as a springboard for class discussion. What is another skill that critical thinkers may have? 

Blog Post 1/25/21

Cooper Grills

Mr. Gillespie

Writ 102 

January 25, 2021

` Blog Post

Ann John’s article is about communities and how we belong to many different communities even if you have different views than your community. We join communities that share similar interests. One community is Athletes. From there, many small groups or clubs make up that community. Such as Football players, or Wrestlers, Basketball players, and so on. Within this community not all Athletes will agree what is the best sport, but they share a common interest in that being in a sport is enjoyable. Not just Athletes join these communities of shared interests. Academic communities exist as well. Many people who study in the same academic field create communities. These communities create their own text which is used to express ideas within their respective communities. Throughout the Academic community there are many different groups that study within their field. Like Scientists, Lawyers, Authors, and Engineers. The smaller groups of these communities, share similar political, social, and religious beliefs. Some of the Communities that I belong to are Greek Life, Undergrad, Car Community, Tennessean, and Engineering Majors. The smaller groups are Phi Kappa Tau, Class of 2024, Japanese Domestic Market (JDM), Middle Tennessee, Civil Engineer Major.

Blog Post Two

Cooper Grills

Mr.Gillespie

Writ 102

January 22, 2021

Blog Post Two

1) What is the rhetorical situation in which Anzaldua finds herself using different language forms?

  1. A) Her Message may be to her mean teacher, but more likely to other Mexiacn Americans    

2) Does Anzaldua’s writing attempt to invoke an emotional response from its readers?

  1. A) Yes, when she is younger and begging to learn English.

3) What makes Anzaldua credible to speak about language practices as a condition of access into a community? 

  1. A) It’s her own personal experience of having to learn to speak better English to be able to be in College.

4) Does the author make any logical appeals to persuade readers? 

  1. A) She Talks about it being a First Amendment Right. Not having to speak perfect English.

5)  What assumptions about culture can we make based on the content of Anzaldua’s text?

  1. A) That she may have been persecuted because of her English and Race.

Blog 1/20/21

Cooper Grills 

Mr. Gillespie 

Writ 102

January 20, 2021

    Blog Post One 

I think the answers were good for me to see and to think about what I need to focus more on this semester. One area I feel I had trouble with was being able to detect problems in writing and defining them. Along with primary and secondary sources in my research. I do feel confident in being able to keep an open mind, along with changing my stance on an issue if presented research that proves my stance wrong. As long as the evidence comes from a credible source that has disguised itself. Everything else that was asked I feel I have a good understanding of the questions, and can use material proficiently

Better Conversation

To truly listen to a person you must follow ten simple rules. First do not multitask  and give the conversation full attention. Don’t be half in the conversation, be completely focused on the conversation. If not just leave the conversation. Second don’t pontificate let there be a response to your statement. Assume you have something to learn when interesting the conversation. Third use open ended questions to receive a good response. Fourth go with the flow, don’t get bogged down with a question you came up earlier in the conversation. Five if you do not know then just admit that you do not know. Six don’t equate experiences there no the same it’s never the same. Seven try not to repeat yourself it’s condescending. Eight stay out of the weed people don’t care. They want to know about you. Nine the most important listen. Talking puts you in control, but listening will gain your knowledge. Ten and the final rule be brief. People live in a busy world. Keep your mind open and you will be amazed. 

\

The two points that would be most useful in my mind would be the third rule and the eight. I find myself not asking very good questions and receiving very short responses. Also rule eight I need to follow a lot more I find myself going into the woods past the weeds. I need to keep focused on the big picture and the main details.

Room for Debate

For the first paper I would give it a B plus. It was difficult to read in some areas. However he did accomplish his goal of telling the reader why activists are good’ and why we need them. He was able to convey his message to the reader and I was able to gain a point on activities from his reading. Overall I think it’s the better of the two. Also maybe some sources would help with paper.

 

The second paper I would give a B minus. It was also hard to read in some places; it bounced around in some places. However its point was made that we don’t need activists. It showed how much pain innocent people can go through. It also needs to show sources, but overall not a bad paper. The first paper I think was the better of the two.

Rhetorical Analysis

Cooper Grills

Mr.Gillespie 

Writing 101

October, 7, 2020

 

The creator of this post is Colion Noir. He is a gun activist who is fighting to keep the Second Amendment and stop gun bands. He is also a lawyer, as well as a host of a web series. He has over 121 million views on his Youtube channel. He has 1,470,000  subscribers on his Youtube channel, and 765 thousand followers on Instagram. He is from Houston Texas, where he attended The University of Houston along with attending Thurgood Marshall school of Law. He has one parent who immigrated to American, from Nigeria.He is also very pro Rebulican.

The author intended the audience to be gun owners. He creates many posts similar to this one warning of potential government infringement on the Second Amendment. He keeps up to date posts about government regulations and laws on firearms. He is very against disarming the police, as well as dis funding funding for the police. The author wants more anti gun people to see this, and change their mind. He also wants to keep irritating his point that gun laws are bad.

The thesis of this article is that democrats don’t have good gun controls laws. Also a ban on tear gas across the nation. The Portland police responded that if tear gas was not used more physical force would need to be used to control the crowd. The police respond to protesters throwing molotov cocktails at police and police stations. The use of tear gas was necessary for dispersing the crowd of angry protesters. Police also said protesters said they wanted to “kill or injure” police officers.

The author makes appeals through examples showing that tear gas and “weapons of war” are necessary tools to keep peace and order. The author used examples to disprove that it was a peaceful protest. He proved that Senator Ed Markery was not completely true about “weapons of war” and tear gas being used on innocent protesters. He proved that the use of tear gas was completely necessary to stop the angry crowd. The crowd was studded calmly by the tear gas.

The author does freanant posts like these to help prove his point. He avidace for every American to have a gun and to stop new gun laws. These posts keep proving his point over and over. Therefore the author is itterrate his point.  

 

Rhetorical Situations

 

 

Title of Article + Proper MLA Citation for Works Cited page Grant-Davis, Keith. “Rhetorical Situations and The Constituents.” Jstor.org , 1997, www.jstor.org/stable/465644 . 
Summarize the article — include your reaction, thoughts, anything to help you remember its claims. 100 to 150 words This article talks about Rhetorical situations and what defines a Rhetorical situation. As well as what parts make a Rhetorical situation : Exigence, Audience, and Constraints. This article also talks about how a Rhetorical situation may be the problem itself, not the actual event that is being asked about.The Rhetorical situation used in the article is one of the American civil war. It companies how soldiers take ground in battle we take ground on an issue. The author also talks about how some of us pick a point to argue yet we don’t even know or understand the point ourselves.
Define new terms and concepts by quoting or paraphrasing the original author.  Exigence – an urgent need or demand.

Audience – the assembled spectators or listeners at a public event, such as a play, movie, concert, or meeting.

Constraints – a limitation or restriction

How does this reading connect to other articles from class and/or your own research?

 

I don’t think it really connects to anything we have read but perhaps it connects to  What The Eyes Don’t See.
Based on the reading, craft one question to act as a springboard for class discussion. What are some famous Rhetorical Situations that I may know? 

Finding a good argument

 

Title of Article + Proper MLA Citation for Works Cited page Jones, Rebecca. “Finding the Good Argument OR Why Bother With Logic?” Http://Writingspaces.org, writingspaces.org/sites/default/files/jones–finding-the-good-argument.pdf. 
Summarize the article — include your reaction, thoughts, anything to help you remember its claims. 100 to 150 words This article talks about how arguments have turned into warfare. That today when people are in arguments we use tactics like in war. We don’t appeal to Logos, Pathos, or Ethos but rather personal attacks. It also talked about how today we dont come to a compromise. That we see it as defeat. When the Greeks debated compromise was a common occurrence that it was not a personal matter. Where today we take everything against our point as a threat. The article also talks about how non violent people pushed their agenda in their arguments with sticking to the point and not getting caught up in personal attacks.
Define new terms and concepts by quoting or paraphrasing the original author. Ethos- is talking to your audience about your subject.

Pathos- To connect to your audience by emotionally appealing to them.

Logos –  Is a logical point for your argument. 

How does this reading connect to other articles from class and/or your own research?

 

It could connect to our mother tongue by the way our parents convinced us as children to do something. So from then on that’s how we try to convince people.
Based on the reading, craft one question to act as a springboard for class discussion. Is there a missing word in the list of three above like one that goes along with fear.