Frank Bruni New York Times

Frank Bruni is a New York Times Op-Ed Columnist who focuses on politics, social issues, education and culture. Before the New York Times Bruni was a White House Correspondent, a restaurant critic, worked for The Times Magazine and was the Rome bureau chief. He also has written three books on ranging topics from himself to Bush to college. He is gay and in his column writes about American life and all its facets whether it pertains to him as a gay man or just to the American people in general.

Bruni uses many rhetorical strategies in his columns but mainly uses rhetorical questions, sarcasm and satire to talk about issues many don’t want to talk about. He addresses things like gay marriage, gay rights, racism, Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton and what it means to be a gay republican.

Rhetorical questions make readers pause and think about what really is going on and makes them question why something happened and how they view it. In “Sex, Lies and Houston”, he makes everyone think about how they view transgender people and the law passed in Houston that cut back transgender people’s human rights through the repetition of rhetorical questions.

“Were some of the same citizens who thrice elected an openly lesbian mayor singling out and vilifying transgender people per se?”

“Or were they buying the idea that legal protections for transgender people would provide a ruse for rapists?”

“Lifestyles?”

The questions he poses makes the reader think about how wrong the law was and how as a country we’ve gotten so far in the area of human rights but how far we have to go to get to true equality.

His columns easily deal with issues people don’t want to talk about because he titles them in ways that bring people in and make them want to read because they of their humor and wit. In his article “Hillary Health Shocker!”, he very sarcastically subtitles it “Because Google and Twitter never lie. There’s something afoot with Clinton”. He uses exaggeration and sarcasm to get people to read an article about what they probably already saw on their social media feeds. In “The Republicans’ Gay Freakout”, Bruni sarcastically points out how Republicans view the gay community and their place in American life. “Let’s by all means worry about the gays! Let’s make sure they know their place”, by saying that he is pointing out that the Republicans think about the gays last because of the laws they pass and the dialect they use. He brings up a hard topic but uses humor as a way to go about it.

In other columns he just says how he feels and where it involves Americans. In his column “Michael Phelps Made Me Cry (Good Tears)” he uses exaggeration describing how everyone spoke about the Olympics and the negativity surrounding Rio but he shows everyone the good and why the Olympics are the epitome of athletics and hard work. He points out how Americans look at not just the Olympics but American life in general with exaggeration, “Somewhere between the Zika stories, the doping stories and the stories about what a fetid, toxic swamp Rio really is, I got the message: I was supposed to feel cynical about these Olympics, the way we feel cynical about pretty much everything these days”.

 

Do You Care More About a Dog Than a Refugee?

  1. The author’s dog died last week and everyone gave condolence’s for her death. On the same day, he posted a column “calling for greater international efforts to end Syria’s suffering and civil war”. Everyone got mad at this article and didn’t care that children were dying in Syria. Syria’s civil war and America’s role in it is a blurred line that no one knows if or how they should cross it.
  2. The author’s purpose is to emotionally attach the reader’s to the people in Syria by making them think of puppies and golden retrievers so that people stop “otherizing” Syria and start caring about the people there. Human lives are just as important as animal lives.
  3. To help the Syrian refugees especially the children
  4. Logos and Pathos- uses logic and plays on emotions
  5. Not very formal because he’s appealing to everyone. Tone shift from sad to serious sad.
  6. Juxtaposition, Repetition, Rhetorical Questions
  7. Yes and they do compliment the article because they juxtapose each other just like the article
  8. It is definitely biased because it is something he cares about deeply.

Kernel Essay “Search Engine” and “What Ever Happened to Frank Snake Church” 9/7

In Sherman Alexie’s “Search Engine” and “What Ever Happened to Frank Snake Church” Alexie juxtaposes two people in order to teach one other lessons about themselves and their lives. However, each short story has very different ways of bringing these two people together and different lessons learned from one another about their identity and their family. “Search Engine” brings out what it means to be “Indian” and what it means to be family through Corliss and Harlan while “What Ever Happened to Frank Snake Church” brings out the what it means to accept yourself and to be okay with the events of life with the characters of Frank and Preacher. Though both stories use the same method of bringing two people together to teach one another a lesson about themselves, Alexie takes his readers on different paths to find their identity and how they view themselves. “Search Engine” is more on the deep and darker road to a self-realization that isn’t as bright and happy while “What Ever Happened to Frank Snake Church” is laced with humor and satire of the heavy to get to the finality of being okay.

Sherman Alexie’s “Search Engine” takes readers on through a blip in the life of Corliss who a female Spokane Indian who struggles with who she is, what she’s worth and really what she is doing with her life. She doesn’t know where she belongs and knows that “she wasn’t supposed to be in college and she wasn’t supposed to be as smart as she was” (Alexie 41) all the while not receiving the support she needed from her parents and her tribe. That questioning and persistent personality of hers leads her to Harlan Atwater’s books and evidentially to Harlan Atwater himself. He makes her question herself and how she sees her tribe and her family. He’s a “lost bird” (Alexie 48) but seems to fit in and know what being “Indian” is more than her who’s been a part of the tribe her whole life. She learns more about herself and that she searches for that acceptance she will never get but really she teaches Harlan more about himself than she learns from him. He realizes that the longing to be Indian and to expected lead him to feeling “fake” (Alexie 46) he was being and that the only people who ever made him feel like he was loved and that he belonged were his two white parents.

“What Ever Happened to Frank Snake Church” is a short story plagued by Frank’s need to “reconnect” with his dead parents. Frank Snake Church gave up “something valuable” to honor his mother after she died and brought it back from the dead when his father died. He played basketball in their memory and in vain to be with them again in some way. Through the story Frank deals with the challenges of losing and gaining people, weight and most importantly himself. He goes through stages of grief and mental trauma that eventually leads him to Preacher, a man who would impact his journey in self-realization the most. Preacher looks inside of Frank to show him how foolish he’s being in the way he’s trying to cope and honor his parents but then pretends to that he didn’t look inside and then reveals to Frank that he really isn’t a preacher and that fakeness makes Frank snap. (Alexie 229) Frank Snake Church plays his entire life with humor in order to cope and get to where he needed to be. No matter the situation he used quick humor and a sort of self-deprecation to mask how he was and how he was coping. Through it all he battled a mental illness that’s not named that really he plays less mind to but what it really takes for him to get to the point of self-acceptance is a physical injury while playing basketball. He wrecks his knee and the physical pain that comes with it brings him to accepting that he may never play basketball again and that with life there is always a change that has to come with time and this change would mean he would accept that he would be okay not only with his injury but with his life and himself as a whole.

Both short stories bring readers to the same conclusion of self-acceptance and identity. Through bringing other people into the protagonist’s lives to teach them a lesson, Alexie gives readers to the heart and soul of each character’s journey. He combats his dark and dim in “Search Engine” to “What Ever Happened to Frank Snake Church’s” wit and satire but brings both stories to hard leading end of being okay with their situations and the events that happened in their lives. Corliss and Frank lead very different lives but through the help of Harlan and Preacher learn that life happens how it happens and that being okay with it is the only way to move on okay with life.

Kernel Essay on Eric Liu and Sherman Alexie

Caroline Franco

Mrs. Buckley

Writ 101

25 August 2016

“Notes of a Native Speaker” by Eric Liu and “Lawyer’s League” by Sherman Alexie discuss the power of identity and the common struggle of assimilation for those who are of color. However, Eric Liu discusses his success and how assimilating means that “ he cannot gain the world without losing his soul” while Sherman Alexie discusses the hardships and thoughts that come with being a person of color in a primarily white political world.  Though they both have different outcomes to their lives and stories, their hardships shaped them and made them think about their own identity and place in the world.

Eric Liu discusses what it means to him to be white even when he technically isn’t really a white person. Eric came from immigrant parents who cared about how he turned out as a person and not as an Asian. To him, his whitness was thrust upon him but yet it was not his own conscious choice. He doesn’t understand his own identity because it is a mix of what he thinks he should be and what he has become. “Now I want desperately to see my face, to see what time has marked and what it has erased.  But I can find no mirror, except the people who surround me.  And they are mainly pale, powerful” shows that Eric Liu doesn’t see that his identity lies in who he is and not where he comes from.

Richard feels his identity is what he can do and how successful he can become as an African American and as a Native American. He doesn’t see his identity in himself but only what he can do to climb the political ladder. He turns down love because he feels as if marrying a white woman would hurt his political agenda as becoming one of the true and excellent African and Native American politicians. He gets angry at the thought of racism and takes the easy way out but he never comprehends the consequences of his actions because to him he will never be Bill Bill. “Okay, true, I broke Big Bill’s nose but he was ugly to begin with”, he will never feel the power and the immunity Big Bill has and that plagues him because being who he is he feels he will never get to the root of his identity and that is success.

Eric Liu and Sherman Alexie both make points on identity and how it is rooted in every individual. Eric Liu makes the point that he gave up his identity as an Asian man and received the power he wanted where Sherman Alexie’s character Richard tried to keep his identity as an African American and Native American but never received the power he wanted because the way other would people view him warp his view on the world. The common theme of identity shows that no matter how one lives their life they will still struggle with who they are.