10 Ways to Have a Better Conversation

Celeste Headlee is giving pointers to a crowd on how to better communicate with people by listening and working on the way they speak to one another. Every job requires communicating but due to technology speaking directly face to face isn’t really necessary and has caused some people who rely heavily on technology to lack in their communication skills. A point that I find useful is when I don’t know something I should probably let it be known that I don’t know. The only reason I don’t do this sometimes is because I feel like what I’m going to ask is something that everybody else already knows and then I’ll look like Boo Boo the Fool. Another piece of advice that I should use is trying not to repeat myself because when I’m talking about something I actually am interested in I end up rambling a lot and saying my same point over and over. 

Rhetorical Analysis of a Social Media Post

JD @imjdollaz Caption: “are you masc or fem?” nigga i’m a grown ass gay man.

The social media post that I’ve chosen to analyze the rhetoric of is by the openly homosexual African American sex worker, JD, and his tweet regarding the societal stigma placed on gay men to group themselves in boxes to further more emphasize their identities. We can tell that JD’s first sentence is a rhetorical question because it is in quotation marks and that the second is his response to it. At first glance his statement may seem like not much of an argument but to his eleven thousand followers mostly composed of other Black gay men, this could interpreted as slightly controversial. JD seems to not like the terms “masc” or “fem” when asked to describe himself because he is a man nevertheless his sexuality and shouldn’t have to confine himself to any category. This may be a reach but the tweet could be an ethos driven rhetoric, he’s indirectly stating his belief and is using that to appeal to others that might feel the same way he does. The author’s use of AAVE and other slang words lets the reader know in the most blunt and simple way possible how he feels. The way he says it may be considered informal or even inappropriate to some people but the message is delivered all the same. It may not look like it but the text actually is a perfectly structured declarative sentence if you disregard everything being in lowercase form which was more than likely just for aesthetic purposes. The initial impact of reading his tweet caught my attention because it works as a doorway to a more complex conversation of stereotypes surrounding the gay community and toxic masculinity. The deeper impact his tweet left with me is why is it that in our society being gay is thought as being less of a man? Straight men aren’t asked to label themselves as masculine or feminine so why do that to gay men? If a man walks into a room rainbowed down head to toe wearing a forty inch wig he is just as much of a man as Jason Mamoa or The Rock. Despite what so many have been led to believe throughout history, being tough, aggressive and hairy doesn’t mean masculine, only being a man does. And there’s no right or wrong way of being a man.

Reading Journal for Grant-Davie

 

Title of Article + Proper MLA Citation for Works Cited page Grant-Davie, Keith. “Rhetorical Situations and Their Constituents” Rhetoric Review, Volume 15, Issue 2, 1997, 246-279. 
Summarize the article — include your reaction, thoughts, anything to help you remember its claims. 100 to 150 words Grant-Davie takes the time to discover the original and true meaning behind the term rhetorical situation. He goes on to explain how rhetors create the situations rather than somehow stumbling upon them and I agree. To me rhetorical situations are like seeds that we plant in our head with the idea that we are somehow going to sprout a solution or visualization of a scene in our life. We try to predict outcomes based on what we’ve already experienced and prior knowledge to the circumstance. Every rhetorical situation requires three things: an issue, an audience, and a set of constraints.
Define new terms and concepts by quoting or paraphrasing the original author. Compound rhetorical situations are when discussions of one subject has different rhetors and audiences.
How does this reading connect to other articles from class and/or your own research?

 

On a previous assignment I had to create a rhetorical ethical dilemma so it connects in that way.
Based on the reading, craft one question to act as a springboard for class discussion. Does rhetorical questions require the same three components as a rhetorical situation?

 

Reading Journal for Jones

 

Title of Article + Proper MLA Citation for Works Cited page Jones, Rebecca. “Finding the Good Argument OR
Why Bother With Logic?” Writing Spaces: Readings on Writing, Volume 1, 2010. 
Summarize the article — include your reaction, thoughts, anything to help you remember its claims. 100 to 150 words Jones explains how over the course of time the word “argument” has become synonymous with negative vibes. A lot of the time our brains look at the word “argument” and see it as being a bad thing when it’s really just two people going back and forward explaining how they feel. It can be good and that’s what Jones is trying to express to the reader here. While reading this I really appreciated the metaphors about an argument being a war that ends with a winner and loser because so often people just end up thinking the exact same way before the argument. It defeats the entire purpose because if your mindset is the same then you just said a whole lot of nothing. 
Define new terms and concepts by quoting or paraphrasing the original author.  The concept of an argument being a war I found pretty interesting and original.
How does this reading connect to other articles from class and/or your own research?

 

 We’ve read other people’s opinions that oppose to some other people so in a way that’s also an argument.
Based on the reading, craft one question to act as a springboard for class discussion.  Who decides who lost the argument?