Question 5. Describe how today’s course material relates to something else you are learning in another course.
I would have to say that what we are doing right now correlates with what I am doing in both my Philosophy and Political Science classes. In these classes, I spend most of my time reading material and then expressing what the author was trying to say. The annotated bibliographies are meant to get us to read an almost excessive amount of material relating to our topic so that we can hopefully write a great research paper. In Philosophy, it’s virtually impossible for me to not read the book if I want to pass the class because I’ve never seen any of the material before. This research paper remind me a lot about my philosophy class since I know absolutely nothing about the myth that I’m attempting to write about. I know that these annoyed bibliographies will allow me to learn so much more about what I’m writing about.
I can tell that I wrote this in a hurry, as I’m sure you can as well. I apologize to the annoyed bibliographies; I did not mean to call them annoyed bibliographies even though they were quite annoying.
As much as I did despise those annotated bibliographies and my philosophy papers, they helped me. I think it goes back to being attentive to what I’m doing. I could have easily skimmed over a few articles an written down some sentences and called them annotated bibliographies but that wouldn’t have done me any good. I think I can say that first semester Grey probably would have done this to save some time, but not the current Grey. Reading article after after helped me know what I was researching. I was able to write a pretty good cause and effect paper because of my attentiveness toward these articles. It may have seemed trivial at the time, but it ultimately got me an A.