Wikipedia defines fake news as this: “a type of yellow journalism or propaganda that consists of deliberate disinformation or hoaxes spread via traditional print and broadcast news media or online social media.”
Though the term has been in existence since the nineteenth century, the introduction of social media and online communication has pushed it to the forefront of communicative issues. Wikipedia’s article on the issue identifies seven distinct types of fake news, and though all are relevant to the daily production of content- especially in online arenas- imposter content and fabricated content are two that affect the development of the issues I discuss in my writing.
Like many social movements that have developed since the time of Occupy Wall Street and Arab Spring, most that continue to gain momentum are organized within a political context. Within its’ political subheading, the Internet Activism page on Wikipedia outlines the influence “Online Political Citizens” or OPC’s hold within their social circle both online and in person.
“According to some observers, the Internet may have considerable potential to reach and engage opinion leaders who influence the thinking and behavior of others. According to the Institute for Politics, Democracy & the Internet, what they call “Online Political Citizens” (OPCs) are “seven times more likely than average citizens to serve as opinion leaders among their friends, relatives and colleagues… Normally, 10% of Americans qualify as Influentials. Our study found that 69% of Online Political Citizens are Influentials.
Contributors admit that younger generations that have grown with the Internet are not as likely to fall for fake news articles, however it is an issue that can hinder development beyond certain demographics if it is not controlled. From my perspective, I see fake news as having the potential to not only harm the credibility of established movements but potentially preventing parties from becoming involved due to an increase in false movements and stories. This, of course, is all speculation that within the next ten years (and with the introduction of Web 3.0) could be phased out with the introduction of artificial intelligence and programming.
I think you’re absolutely right about the risk fake news poses to younger people. They’re not likely to fall for it, but they’re very likely to just stop caring all together. And that’s probably more dangerous to society in the long run.