“Reclaiming Individuality Amidst Social Media’s Tyranny Draft 1”

A saying of online life goes, “Every day, the internet picks a hero and a villain, and you hope that neither one is you”. Social media, an envisaged tool created to bring communities and different types of people together, has instead torn us apart. Instead of harmony, it brings contention and oppression.

Social media was once praised for its history of  supporting and showcasing individual distinctiveness, upholding individuality, and for its boundless freedom of expression. Now, it has forgone inclusion. Now, it is criticized for limiting expression and thought that does not fit within the view of the majority, and pressuring people with fear. As New York Times author David Brooks says, “ Many people carefully guard their words, afraid they might transgress one of the norms that have come into existence.”. How do we stand against this accepted oppression, if we are unable to even speak our own thoughts without fear of reproach? 

The answer lies within. It is up to us to stand firm in our opinions and beliefs, and to not sway with the shifting judgments of the crowd. For instance, have you ever felt condemned, ignored, or attacked after expressing or questioning a seemingly undefined group or cause? It is then possible that you might have felt the wrath of social media’s shame culture. For example, if someone were to voice their support for the shut down of the musical app “Tik Tok” on twitter, they would most likely be mocked, ignored, criticized, and/or cyber-bullied, because most of the population enjoys this app. Another term for this is “cancelled”, or “cancel culture”. It is where a person is disregarded or condemned after expressing an unpopular or opposing view. This can be deemed as a form of shame culture, in that it is ostracizing and punishing people in order to rigidly enforce the acceptance of the majority’s opinion. New York Times Author David Brooks eloquently and concisely describes this problem, and offers an affective solution, which is: to decide for yourself, to reclaim your mind. We must make this claim on our minds, because striving to become like everyone else will inevitably lead to pain and/ or confusion. Conforming will just delay the inevitable existential crisis that comes to all who do  not know who they are.

Inside all of us is the intrinsic human need to relate , to be understood. Sometimes we will do whatever it takes to do just that. Even if it means forgoing our beliefs, or verbally abusing others for the praise of a majority. In doing this, we lose sight of our inner compass, and become absorbed into the crowd to avoid exclusion. To avoid being a follower, you must take your life into your own hands, and decide. You must stand on ideas of your own, and stick to them. Be understanding, but unwavering. Be kind, but firm in your beliefs. And decide: whose life are you really living? Avoid conformity by setting your own course, considering compassionate action, and choosing  individuality.

Daily Write #17

My target audience when writing my argument essay was mainly to the youth of the world, although the subject was applicable to most age groups. This time, when writing an Op-Ed, my audience will most likely be readers from various ages. More specifically, I predict college students or senior citizens. These are the people I think would most read my op-ed. Since the audience has been widened, I will try to include more factual evidence, as to not overwhelm readers with my opinion since I am a member of the youth. This will help me come across as less biased. Additionally, since this is an Op-Ed, I assume there is a bit of leniency in formality or tone,  which I will be pleased to convey.

Argument Unit Reflection

This reflection unit was, surprisingly, easier than the last. However, I did have to surmount the expected trials or bumps in the road. Two sources were provided for me, which proved enormously helpful. However, it took a minute to find a fitting third source that would adequately support the thesis, and intertwine with the other two sources. Because of the previous essay, in which we had to analyze an article, I found it easy to analyze the sources individually. I am not the best at synthesizing, so this proved a bit of a challenge for me. The MLA/APA power-point on “how and when to cite or quote” helped me a lot, as well as the argumentative essay checklist. The most helpful aspect of this writing journey, however, was the peer review and instructor comments. It provided me an opportunity to view my paper objectively, and make corrections accordingly. I put a great amount of effort and time into this paper. I made google documents on each of the sources, as to analyze them separately. I also made notes and comments that would help me synthesize the similar characteristics. This proved helpful in a myriad of ways, and I think I will do this with each future paper that I write. I spent about four hours doing just these documents. I have found that breaking down different aspects of a paper help writers to better assemble its whole. Overall, this proved to be a very enlightening journey in my writing career.

Daily Write #13

After reading my professor’s kind, and very helpful, comments, I have added more information from my second source in order to relate it to my third source. Additionally, I have tried to cite in places where I could not, or did not, paraphrase. I have also added a works cited page. Thank you so much, the comments were very illuminating and helpful!

Daily Write #11

Based upon my peer’s comments, I will place my thesis statement better, or re-organize it to fit the flow of the paper. Also, I will add information about what shame culture is, because reader’s may be unfamiliar. I will also move this information to the introduction or first body paragraph.

Weekly Write #4

My chosen word is “determination”. I would confidently say that this word adequately describes my performance in school so far. There have been many instances of self-doubt, however, I make myself push on. I have found that regarding determination, practice makes perfect. The more I make myself do certain tasks, or study, the less of a pain it becomes. For example, my college algebra mid term was approaching, and I was not feeling too well. However, I climbed out of bed and made myself study and prepare so that I would make an A. I did make an A. I credit all motivation to God, who is my constant encourager and motivator. To continue being determined, I will pray for this mindset to follow me next year, and the rest of the semester.

Weekly Write 3

For my third source, I will be using a YouTube video/ podcast titled “Cancel Culture, Guilt, and Shame” by Abdu Murray. I consider Abdu Murray to be a qualified source. Regarding the CRAAP model,  it is current in that it premiered only five months ago, on April 16, 2020. It is relevant in that it discusses the issue and history of Guilt and Shame culture nationwide and worldwide. Abdu Murray has authority to cover this topic because he is senior vice president of Ravi Zacharias International Ministries, an organization that frequently discusses controversial modern day issues, the author of four books, and, as an attorney, was named several times in Best Lawyers in America and Michigan Super Lawyer. I feel being a lawyer adds to his credibility and authority because it gives him argumentative, defensive experience when discussing claims. Murray uses past experiences, as well as social observations, for evidence or accuracy. Lastly, this video satisfies the “purpose” of the CRAAP model in that it directly talks about the issue of a guilt or shame culture. Additionally, the multi-media source can relate to my chosen New York Times article because Murray discusses the status and impact of social media within such cultures.