This session helped me grow in many ways. I got to learn different approaches from my peers, which helped me revise my thesis. I also have a clearer grasp on what the purpose of synthesis is. In essence, synthesis is making a point by combining the similarities and differences of multiple sources, or, making a claim based upon the connections between sources. I am glad that this was brought to my attention, as it directly impacts my view of the articles, and therefore, my writing process. Formerly, my thesis was a bit vague and lifeless. Now, I have a thesis that hooks readers and establishes a topic. The methods used included, but were not limited to, color coding, pro con listing, and venn diagraming. As for questions, I asked what methods were most effective for each member, and how they helped shape the thesis. Overall, I would say that the discussion group improved my writing abilities in terms of conciseness and clarity. I find this extremely helpful because I tend to go on tangents when I write- or talk. This will force me to use the strongest words in my writing, so that readers don’t become bored or confused, and to ensure the point is fully realized.
