In the peer reviews, I have be extremely grateful for the insight of my peers. I do think it has help me with my essays and sometimes there opinion gave confirmation of certain aspects of my papers I was unsure of. With the analysis essay the best advice I received was to add more structure to the essay and give more background information. I think this information was very helpful because I was unsure if readers would be able to get a clear understanding of my paper. After the peer review for that essay, my essay had more structure, not the best structure, as well as more background information. With the argument essay I was unsure of the counterargument, was it clear or even present in my rough draft. After the peer review I received confirmation that it could have been more clear and that readers were basically trying to read between the lines to understand my essay.
I think that the way I gave feed-back didn’t necessarily change over the course. I tried to give advice the way I wanted someone to give me advice. I think the best advice would be to check for grammar error. I think grammar places a major part in keeping a readers’ attention and helps the flow of an essay. I think that if an essay is hard to read, it’s hard to understand, which possibly means the writer didn’t get their point across the way they intended.