I think that reflection is key, following anything that you do creatively or intellectually, to really knowing how you felt and what you did. They say hindsight is 20/20 and I think that reflection in this class after large assignments, is a great way to let the teacher see your thought process, conclusions you came up with on your own about your work, and things you may have done differently. It is a great way to evaluate and comment on your writing process.
Month: April 2016
Simile Daily Write
My semester has been like running a marathon with no finish line. I have constantly felt stressed out with no end in sight (until now)! This semester was definitely required more effort from me then the last semester and I was not expecting it! Hopefully I have handled it well and that my hard work will pay off in the end.
Suicide CRQ
This article, ‘Buddy Check on 22!’ Veterans Use Social Media to Fight Suicide, shone a positive light to social media and while the statistics and things these people who sacrificed their lives for the country go through on and off the line of duty are alarming and horrifying, it is so nice to know that they have a support system if they need one. This entire article was compelling, sad and positive all at once but the lines that called me from the page were, “It was March 22. To many civilians, just another Tuesday. But to thousands of veterans and active-duty soldiers, the 22nd of every month is a reminder to make a suicide prevention spot-check on former comrades.” To think of thousands of men and women feeling a certain way on a certain day every single month, having flashbacks to war zones, was hard to believe but the lines had tones of compassion and camaraderie and it was so positive and uplifting to think of these thousands of men and women being able to have an accessible safety net of people to turn to. Unfortunately, those who have support systems are still afflicted to the point where a support system doesn’t help or matter. My life had never been touched by suicide until last spring when a girl that I had gone to school with took her life a month before her expected high school graduation. Once word got out and the school brought in grief counselors, I remember everyone going back through her Facebook, Instagram and Twitter trying to find a clue or something foreboding that we all had missed. Word got out that she had sent text messages to four or five of her closest friends minutes before she decided to take her own life but those people thought she was being her usual sweet, thoughtful self and had no idea that those would be her final words. She had been active on social media but there were no signs that anyone felt pointed to what she was going to do. I began to wonder if there really had been no one for her to talk to who could have helped her make a different decision. I looked at my own life and thought of the people I would go to if I were having similar thoughts. However, Natalie, like many other people, was afflicted with depression and while I could think of a list of people a mile long to help me out, her brain blocked her from thinking of a single person. I can only imagine my brain blocking me and then being filled with war images of death, violence and dust like the veterans that suffer with PTSD. We will never really know the thoughts that go through a specific person’s head before they decide that life is no longer worth living, but it is comforting to know that those that come home alive from the war, have a growing system of support. It would be nice to know that every person had this same net of support through an accessible social media platform. Are schools, private agencies and the government doing enough to raise awareness about suicide across the country?
Derby Days Incident
I totally agree with what Rachel Wilson had to say in response to the horrible and offensive events of last Friday night. The Sigma Chi’s responsible for the comments should be held responsible but I, like Rachel, believe that the issue is much larger then that. It unfortunately is a cultural issue that many college aged boys have little to no respect for women. I hope that her words are amplified and made an example of because she it spot on.
Freedom of Speech Daily Write
George Takei’s words are something that I think everyone should know and try to abide by in their lives. I am not saying that speech should be stifled, but “it’s a free country with free speech” is not an excuse, in my opinion, to say horrible or offensive things and feel as though you had the right to do so. Also, a lot of people say things and then get offended when a dialogue ensues that does not directly agree with what they said. Takei addresses this in a perfect way saying that if you get to say what you want to then everyone else has the right to respond how they want to.
Games You Can’t Win CRQ
This Op-Doc from the New York Times called, Games You Can’t Win by David Osit and Malika Zouhali-Worrall was by far the darkest thing that I have had to write about in this class. While many aspects of the article and video were very poignant, what called me from the page was, “While their reasons for creating these games vary, one element clearly unites these developers: the video game is their chosen artistic medium, and programming is their paintbrush.” Upon first reading this the comparing of these dark video games to art really surprised me and I felt as though it was an unjust comparison. How were these dark and upsetting video games anything compared to a painting by Jean-Michel Basquiat that hangs in the most famous museums in the world or even a piano piece written by a child? When the authors of the article portion of the Doc-Ed opened up with the line, “Video games are generally associated with guns and explosions — a medium better suited to escapism than intimacy” I got the impression that the authors felt videogames were just a game that teenage boys played and one that they did not deem held any other merits other then to express pent up aggression. As a senior in high school, brother spends more time playing on his XBOX then he does with my parents, a fact that I am sure many sisters of teenage brothers would corroborate. It was weird for me to think that his controlling an animated football player to run up and down an animated football field or defending an animated country in animated war was art. Once I watched the video and saw the plight and trauma that the three experiences caused on the four people highlighted in the documentary, I understood why someone, like the animated football maker or animated war maker, would want their story told in a way that instead of reading it as a book or hearing it as a song or viewing it hanging on the wall, could be felt and seen step by step in a video game. As hard as it would be to watch and to play a “game” that can not be won and demonstrates a sex change or living with a child with terminal cancer, it is a way to convey every emotion and the feeling of a never ending struggle just like Basquiat conveyed on canvas or the way the Coronation of Napoleon tells a story hinging in the Louvre. Why is it that people, like I was, are turned off by the idea of immersing themselves in a game about a child dying from terminal cancer but could stare at a paining of mass annihilation or a traumatic event in history for hours in awe?
Osit, David, and Malika Zouhali-worrall. “Games You Can’t Win.” The New York Times. The New York Times, 16 Mar. 2016. Web. 18 Apr. 2016.
How to Survive the Semester
- Get as much sleep as you possibly can
2. Study your hardest by forming a study group or just a group of people to go to the library with
3. Treat your self to something that relaxes you when you feel confident about your work
http://giphy.com/gifs/parks-and-recreation-aziz-ansari-ADueB6dc3Dapi
Researched Argument Unit Reflection
For the Researched Argument Unit, the course learning outcome that connected to my work the most is the obvious choice, research: students will understand what constitutes credible evidence, how to incorporate evidence in their own writing, and how to use library databases to find sources of evidence. I had to find sources for this paper, as with every paper, but this paper required scholarly sources that I was able to find using the Ole Miss library database. This was my first time using a library database for a paper and it was a very useful tool that I will definitely be using in the future. It was nice to know that the Ole Miss database was most likely not going to lead me to a source that was not a credible one, but I still had to learn how to check to make sure that the author was indeed credible. The hardest part for me was incorporating the evidence I found into my paper. Finding the sources that coincided with my topic was easy and interesting but I kept wanting to summarize everything I had found and really had to work on condensing it and only writing the basics, what the reader needed to know, and filling in the rest with my analysis. As with the other papers I had written, I struggled with analysis but this time I really felt like in the end I nailed it and could see improvement in my analyzing skills since my first paper in this class which was very rewarding. I was really proud of myself when writing this paper for absorbing some of the constructive criticism I had received on the past two papers and working hard to not repeat the mistakes I had made in earlier writings. Overall this paper was the biggest challenge for me but is the paper I have come to be most proud of in this writing class.
Discussing Politics Is Not For the Lighthearted CRQ
In the politically charged opinion piece by Arthur C. Brooks, the lines that called out to me were about the distaste that people from opposite parties had for each other. Brooks writes that “[W]e also don’t like one another very much. Thirty-eight percent of Democrats have a “very unfavorable” view of Republicans, and 43 percent of Republicans hold that view of Democrats. About half of “consistently liberal” Americans say most of their friends share their views, and about a third say it’s important to live in a place where that is so. For those who are “consistently conservative,” these preferences are even more pronounced” (Brooks para 5). Originally upon reading this, his words surprised me and I doubted the validity of the statement. However, upon looking at my own life, I realized that the people I associate with and, on a wider scale, those that my parents associate with, all have the same political bumper stickers on their cars or signs in their front yards this election season. This confirmed and made me see the possibility of this in the rest of the country, that when it comes to politics birds of a feather (generally) flock together. It occurred to me that this “flocking together” is the easy route, realizing that it is easy to go to dinner and talk about politics when everyone can generally agree without getting heated. Of course it would be nice if people from opposing parties didn’t have to discuss politics in a way that is “more contemptuous than angry, overflowing with sneering, mockery and disgust (Brooks para 9)”, but in today’s world that is how politics are not only talked about over the dinner table, but in televised debates between opposing party candidates. Since living together is the easy route, the hard route would be, in my opinion, trying to persuade those who did not share your views in an educated, calm, neighborly manor instead of the fervent anger or feeling of the others stupidity that is seen and felt in most debates. It is easier to get mad and understandably so when it comes to something you are passionate about but most people do not respond to anger and the feeling of being looked down upon so it seems that it would be much better to try and convince someone by presenting yourself as on the same level as the person you are trying to convince. This is rarely seen even among educated adults, who as these statistics show, can hardly bear to live near people of the opposing political party. This raises the question of why people can hardly ever seem to peacefully discuss politics? If you were a real estate agent trying to persuade your clients to buy a house, you would not start by screaming at them about how horrible, disgusting and stupid their current house was and then in a pompous manner describe how this new house was all the better. So why do educated and involved adults take that approach when talking to their friends and colleagues about politics?
Brooks, Arthur C. “Bipartisanship Isn’t for Wimps, After All.” The New York Times. The New York Times, 09 Apr. 2016. Web. 11 Apr. 2016.
Daily Write
The most recent creative endeavor I found myself on was the last time I was visting home and was visiting my local URBN factory store. This store is heaven for any girl that likes the brands that URBN owns: Free People, Anthropologie and Urban Outfitters. This store is packed with things that was sent back to or didn’t sell from the distribution center up the road and is a place I frequent more then I should when I am home. It requires creativity just to walk into the place, clothes are in boxes on the floor, furniture is broken and there are chips in the china they sell, but everything in the store can be repurposed for a new use. While searching I came across a ripped poster of a beach scene that I had to have and somehow make work in my bedroom at home. I took it home, cut it to fit a frame I had purchased, and to get rid of the tear in the poster, and proudly hung it up on my wall. Although it was a small feat, every time I go home and look at it, I think about my little creative endeavor proudly.