Final Reflection

When it came to writing I thought I knew all that I needed to know to be an above average writer. I have written difficult papers in the past before but had never reflected on a single one of them. Throughout this class I have found that reflection is the best way to understand the strengths and weaknesses in my writing because it involves taking a step back and looking at my work before, during and after I had finished with it. This class, particularly the reflections and weekly analysis that I wrote in the Common Place Book, taught me that I was far from knowing everything about being a good writer.

My first reflection I wrote on a paper and my first CRQ were weak and showed a writer that was insecure and overcompensated using large words, lots of summary and a bad implementation of quotations taken from articles and writing prompts. The difference I found in writing in the Common Place Book versus speaking in class was that the ideas I discussed and the personal stories or feelings I wrote in my Common Place Book were only between my teacher and me. The idea that the Common Place Book was a personal space to discuss thoughts and feelings comforted me and helped me to use it to its full potential as a helpful writing tool. By using the Commonplace book like a personal writing journal, I found that the most important part of the writing process is the reflection written on the progress of the current paper before it is finished. In these reflections I was able to see the most growth and even though I was writing as an assignment, it helped me immensely to flesh out the things I was struggling with. All of my life and especially at the start of this class, I hated research and analytical writing. I always found that writing on topics I was passionate about or personal stories came more naturally to me. However, after cranking out a CRQ week after week, I have become a writer that can respond to a prompt even if the prompt mentions things I have never heard of, let alone written about. Not only can I respond and write about these topics weekly, but I can do so confidently.

By doing weekly CRQ’s and reflections on my papers in the Commonplace Book, I have become a less formal more to the point writer who has found her own voice. I feel like I can write a well formulated response on any topic or prompt and still be able to implement things that are unique to me and my writing. I have exhibited so much growth in my writing and I hope that the learning does not stop there. I never again think that I know all I need to know about writing because if this class has taught me anything it is that I will never stop improving my writing skills.

Reflection on “Is the New York Times a Liberal Newspaper” Article

The first time I ever heard of the New York Times as basically a national newspaper, and actually comprehending its status as one, was in the home of my aunt and uncle in Los Angeles when my uncle brought in two newspapers. One was local news and the one he opened first and voraciously began to read was The Times. My aunt and uncle lived and worked in New York City for all of 20 years. To them, it is a local paper. My first time reading it was today when I flipped through my online subscription. I would agree with Daniel Okrent, author of this article, that it is a liberal newspaper. I think the newspaper is liberal almost to a fault. If this was the only source of news to a person, I think that person would be denied the crucial “two sides to every story” saying and would therefore be deprived of knowing or thinking any differently then that of the authors of the pieces they have read. The example that Okrent used proved that when it comes to hot social issues, like gay marriage, with the exception of one article, The Times only propagated “a tone of cheerleading.” I think that readers of The Times should read on, enjoy and soak up everything good about the newspaper, but to keep in mind that there is another side and to explore it.