I think that it is not fair that the terms violence and disruption are used interchangeably because with MLK and others they weren’t being violent nor disruption by peacefully protesting what they felt was right. The police and others felt the need to respond violently because they may have felt that the peaceful protest was disturbing the peace but they were only marching. Every disruption isn’t violent.
A movement should make sure that it is known that it is nonviolent and their intentions are to just peacefully protest what they believe is right even if violence is done in its name. I feel like the public could and couldn’t bear responsibility because if they agree and want to protest and everything then its their responsibility but they can question the movement to make sure their both on the right track.