What is a writer?

In my life and experience, a writer is someone who draws from their life experiences and their opinions and creates something new from it. Writing can come in many forms whether it be nonfiction or fiction, poetry or research. Writing allows people to express themselves however they feel that they need to. It is a space where they can be completely honest, both with themselves and others and really put themselves out there. For me, writing gives me an outlet to be able to express whatever I am feeling. Even in an academic environment, it benefits me to express opinions that I have on certain things. One can be a writer even if all they do is write in their diary. Writing also can give people so much power, especially when they put intention behind every word they choose as Donald Murray wrote. He recognized that each word is a choice that can strengthen your writing. One thing I love about writing is being able to read someone’s words and recognize what in their background might have contributed to them saying what they did. Deborah Brandt recognizes that each person has certain things in their life that affect them and their writing choices. She called these sponsors of literacy. Being able to see those in others’ writing is really cool and I like the idea that I am also affected by things in my life and other people can see that as well. Overall, writing is really good to help with an expression of self and anybody can take it up and begin writing.

“Ten Ways to Have a Better Conversation”

The Ted Talk video talks about how we can have more meaningful conversations with people. It highlights ten points or strategies that will aid one to have better talks with others. She reveals that the secret is to act like an interviewer. When one interviews someone else, they put most of the focus on the other person. She says that the most important strategy is to listen. She also reveals her own attitude, in that she believes “everyone is an expert in something.” That viewpoint has never failed her and allowed her to gain something meaningful from each person she encounters. Even though one may dislike a person or disagree with them, it is still possible to converse with them and come away from it with something new. Each person has their own perspective, so when talking to them, do not compare your own experience and invalidate theirs in the process. Each person is unique and individual and it is important to remember. One thing that I could implement in my life when speaking to others is to try not to multitask. It is so easy for me to get sidetracked and start working on something else when another person is speaking. It is important to give them my focus to show their importance to me and my willingness to listen. If I am paying attention, I will not have to pretend to.

Rhetorical Analysis of Social Media Post

I chose the post by rhetor Rachel Zegler regarding abortion and planned parenthood and the benefits that are included with the program via twitter. She is a singer and actor that is very outspoken about her beliefs regarding the rights of other people. She advocates for minorities and those who cannot stand up for herself. She wrote this tweet in response to the debate between vice presidents in preparation of the 2020 election. The two candidates were discussing planned parenthood and their stances on it. Her intended audience were the people who were also talking about the election who were only focusing on abortion as part of planned parenthood. She wanted to enlighten those who did not recognize the other benefits that the service of planned parenthood provides and show them that they were bypassing the majority of things that helped those who used planned parenthood. Her audience was also her followers and the general population because she wanted to show them how she felt about this topic. Generally, the service assists women in many things beyond just pregnancies and birth control and rather helps them with feminine health, especially when other services are not available when they need them. Zegler’s overall thesis is that planned parenthood benefits women in ways that are bigger than just abortion, whether you personally agree with it or not, so eradicating that service would harm women in a bigger sense. She appeals to people’s logos by reasoning that planned parenthood focuses on many services anyways, rather than coming across as biased in that she supports abortion. Her approach to include logos allows people to look at her argument from a different stand point and recognize objectively that whether one agrees with abortion or not, planned parenthood plays a bigger role beyond that. She also made an appeal to pathos by relating her own experience of when she was in need of a certain service. Although her local ob/gyn was not there to provide for her when she needed it, planned parenthood would have come through for her to help her receive the help she needed. Other women can relate and know the struggle of finding help when it is difficult to look for. They empathize with her want for assistance at her fingertips. It makes other people realize that not everything can be provided for by the people that are supposed to provide it. Planned parenthood helps fulfill needs where other services are lacking.

 

 

Reading Journal for Grant-Davie

Title of Article + Proper MLA Citation for Works Cited page Grant-Davie, Keith. “Rhetorical Situations and Their Constituents.” Rhetoric Review, vol. 15, no. 2, 1997, pp. 264–279.
Summarize the article — include your reaction, thoughts, anything to help you remember its claims. 100 to 150 words In the article, Grant-Davie explores the preexisting definitions of exigence, rhetor, audience, and constraints. He then tweaks each definition to more accurately fit his picture of them. Exigence should be used to determine what is being discussed, why it’s needed, and what purpose it accomplishes. By determining the audience, one can cater their techniques to help further reach them. However, when writing, the rhetor cannot escape constraints such as religion, race, or laws. The rhetor himself must also have “integrity” and “receptivity” which are consistency yet adaptability. The purpose of one’s discourse is to ultimately come to a solution or conclusion.
Define new terms and concepts by quoting or paraphrasing the original author. Exigence- context or reason behind the discourse.
How does this reading connect to other articles from class and/or your own research? This connects to Jones article about argumentation because they both highlight that the purpose of argument is not to fight but rather to come to a solution and educate those who may not have had all the information.
Based on the reading, craft one question to act as a springboard for class discussion. Do you as a writer take the time to intentionally choose the techniques that go into your writing?

 

Reading Journal for Jones

Title of Article + Proper MLA Citation for Works Cited page Jones, Rebecca. “Finding the Good Argument OR Why Bother With Logic?” Writing Spaces: Readings on Writing, edited by Charles Lowe and Pavel Zemliansky, Parlor Press, West Lafayette, IN, 2010, pp. 156–168. 
Summarize the article — include your reaction, thoughts, anything to help you remember its claims. 100 to 150 words The article tries to erase the idea that arguing is a bad thing by demonstrating argumentation as a “dance” rather than a “war.” Many good things actually come from arguing, including social change or even changes in one’s self. They result in growth and they bring awareness to issues and the different perspectives on them. The purpose of arguing should be to educate, inform, and even persuade the audience of a certain topic or at the very least, allow them to form better opinions based on the information. Jones then talks about the several different methods of appealing. Pathos plays onto the audience’s emotions; Ethos appeals to the ethics of the situation; logos appeals to their logic. Each writer should keep this in mind and choose which appeal fits the argument the best. 
Define new terms and concepts by quoting or paraphrasing the original author. N/A
How does this reading connect to other articles from class and/or your own research? This article reminds me of Murray’s writing about revising. When we write, each word we choose is a choice. It is the same for when we use the appeals in our writing. We can pick and choose where we should put what in order that it is the most effective.
Based on the reading, craft one question to act as a springboard for class discussion. How do we already use the appeals in our writing and how can we make our efforts to use them more intentional?

 

Summary of Common Read Ch 1-5

In What the Eyes Don’t See by Mona Hanna-Attisha, she sets the scene by sharing what her normal routine is. She gives an overview of her place in society and her career as a pediatrician. She is very passionate for her work and cares for the people of her community. At a gathering of old friends, one of them informs her that the government is covering up the amount of lead in the drinking water. She is completely shocked and feels betrayed, wondering where the people who are supposed to be doing their jobs have disappeared to. Being so invested in the well-being of her community, she immediately sets out to educate herself of the subject and looks into it to see what she can do to help the situation.

Reading Journal for Murray

Title of Article + Proper MLA Citation for Works Cited page Murray, Donald M. “The Maker’s Eye: Revising Your Own Manuscripts.” Language Awareness: Readings for College Writers. 8th ed. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2000: 161-165.
Summarize the article — include your reaction, thoughts, anything to help you remember its claims. 100 to 150 words Donald Murray outlines the process a writer must take to produce a piece of quality. He emphasizes the importance of revision after completing a draft that contains the seven elements of writing, knowing that is when the true writing begins. A writer must look first to make sure that the technical aspects of it are accurate and then look further beyond it to the main ideas and thoughts that create the piece. A careful writer goes over every single word when revising, knowing that he could change it or rearrange it to improve the writing. To him, the words on the page are always subject to change and, in that way, alive. There is always room to improve the writing and it may never seem like enough. The only thing stopping the writer from continuing to revise is the deadline. 
 
How does this reading connect to other articles from class and/or your own research?

 

This is connected to Elbow’s piece because it emphasizes the importance of ideas. While Murray talks about how important it is to get every word right, he recognizes that the ideas behind the words are still of more importance. Elbow also believed that and therefore explained that the words may not be perfect, but the ideas can still be conveyed despite that.
Based on the reading, craft one question to act as a springboard for class discussion. Why is revising more important than the actual writing itself?

 

My Sponsors of Literacy

  1. What is literacy to you? Literacy to me is any piece or text that I’ve had my hands on during my lifetime.
  2. Who’s one of your Sponsors of Literacy? One of my sponsors of literacy are the short children books I had as a child and my father, who would help me read them.
  3. Write a scene with this Sponsor of Literacy like Fishman did in her piece. The dozens of thin books that sat on the shelf in the extra room of the house were a constant reminder of literacy in my childhood. When I was bored, I would go searching for them, knowing that they would satiate my boredom for a little while. Before I knew how to read, I would simply look at the pictures and try to absorb as much as I could that way or ask my father to read one after his long day of work. His soothing voice bringing the words to life is what sparked my love of reading. It took a while for me to get the hang of reading by myself, but once I did, the words flew off the pages faster than I could keep track of. Whenever my aunt came from Colorado to visit, she would recommend books to me and sometimes gift me them. She also influenced my love of reading, supplying me with new content to continue my search for words. We shared many discussions about how simple reading allowed us to travel to a completely different world despite our tethers to real life. They fed the fire within my brain that only wanted words from new books that contained special worlds.

Reading Journal for Fishman

Title of Article + Proper MLA Citation for Works Cited page Fishman, Andrea R. “Literacy and Cultural Context: A Lesson from the Amish.”Language Arts, vol. 64, no. 8, 1987, pgs 842-849.
Summarize the article — include your reaction, thoughts, anything to help you remember its claims. 100 to 150 words The text depicts the lives of those in an Amish family and the type of literacy they experience. Within their home, they create a literacy specific to the Amish. They learn how to read and write letters to one another and play games to teach reading and writing. However, some of the learning is pure imitation, but all of it is necessary to reinforce their cultural teachings and practices. Their literacy helps them understand their role in society. While what they experience may be different from mainstream households, it is still important and holds as much value as any other home in helping the children become literate.
Define new terms and concepts by quoting or paraphrasing the original author. Esoteric- something meant to be understood by a group of people
How does this reading connect to other articles from class and/or your own research? This connects to what Gee said about literacy. Literacy can come from anywhere. The Fisher’s entire home and way of life is a form of literacy.
Based on the reading, craft one question to act as a springboard for class discussion. How much of an effect does religion have on a person’s literacy?

 

James Gee Reading Journal

 

Title of Article + Proper MLA Citation for Works Cited page  James Gee. “What Is Literacy?” Journal of Education, vol. 171, no. 1, Jan. 1989, pp. 18–23.
Summarize the article — include your reaction, thoughts, anything to help you remember its claims. 100 to 150 words James Gee defines literacy as “control of secondary uses of language” (23). While primary discourse includes more basic and informal speaking abilities, secondary discourses are anything beyond that. He also believes that these are learned through experience rather than sitting down and studying a book. When people have events in their lives that they can connect to an idea, it is much easier for them to learn. Gee also spoke of this in his video on learning with video games. You can give a person a manual, but it may not make any sense until they play the game and connect the two.
Define new terms and concepts by quoting or paraphrasing the original author. Enculturation- the gradual adoption of norms from a cultural
How does this reading connect to other articles from class and/or your own research?

 

Everybody’s different experiences shape how well they can learn about certain topics. In Brandt’s sponsors of literacy, she speaks about influences of writing created by each individual’s own experiences. Depending on the person, how they experience the same thing will change and be different for everyone.
Based on the reading, craft one question to act as a springboard for class discussion. How would someone with a background of engineering react to learning about physics compared to how someone with a background in theatre.